Story comments - Reporter-Times.com/MD-Times.com

Hot topics » City proposes annex changes County takes next step on d ... Reader applauds cemetery cl ...

Premium price for highway

read more recent story comments Reader comments

TheMax
Monday, October 15, 2012: 11:43 am
More from TheMax

Nice timing on this article...
October 7th Front Page headline in the Indianapolis Star reported that there is no money to extend I 69 North from Bloomington to Indianapolis.

dbaker
Monday, October 15, 2012: 2:21 pm
More from dbaker

Editorial: End of the I-69 road brings some relief

5:28 PM, Oct 8, 2012 |
Comments

A
A

Filed Under
Opinion
Editorial
City-county Council
Mitch Daniels

What's bad news for state highway planners may be good news for residents and businesspeople on the Southside of Indianapolis.

The lack of funds to finish the final leg of the I-69 extension from Evansville to Indianapolis, as reported Sunday by The Star's Ryan Sabalow, could satisfy widespread opposition to the Indy connection, a posture that crosses political party lines.

Far more expensive than alternative routes were projected to be, the so-called new-terrain corridor for I-69 would cost more than $1 billion for its Bloomington-to-Indianapolis section alone, and that is money the state doesn't have and doesn't have any prospect of getting.

If that means the hugely controversial Indy-to-Evansville highway becomes a Bloomington-to-Evansville highway, the governor and other backers seem at peace with it, at least for the indefinite future.

Opponents, who are legion in Southern Indiana and beyond, see the foreshortening as no better than the stall-out of a boondoggle, and no consolation for immense losses in farmland, forests, homes and businesses that already have been incurred. Nor will the grand promise of saving appreciable travel time between Indianapolis and Evansville likely be fulfilled.

In Indianapolis, relief may be the dominant reaction. Republican state Rep. Brent Waltz, who represents the area, has said Perry Township stands to lose $300 million in taxable property should the I-69 interchange be built there. Citing multiple negative impact on the community, the City-County Council and Marion County Alliance of Neighborhood Associations have formally opposed the connection.

The Indianapolis link has been a looming multimillion-dollar question ever since the state, under Gov. Mitch Daniels' predecessor, rejected a proposed route that would have used existing I-70 for the I-69 extension, with substantial savings to the taxpayer.

Now, it appears, the question may be moot. The decades-long I-69 saga may be coming to its end. And not a mile too soon.

Douglas W Arthur
Tuesday, October 16, 2012: 9:27 am
More from Douglas W Arthur

Oh no.....has the crystal ball failed!!...my kindom for an exit.....

In the words of Bullwinkle J. Moose�..
Hey, watch me pull a I-69 exit outta my hat!
Again?
Nothin' up my sleeve ------ Presto!
[pulls a �I don�t care, I�m on the way out and heading to Purdue Governor� out of the hat]
Bullwinkle: Well, I'm gonna need another hat!

Sunny
Tuesday, October 16, 2012: 8:34 pm
More from Sunny

Douglas W Arthur,

I shall remember in the future not to be consuming a beverage while reading your posts. Laughter during that process forces one to inhale liquid! I think the Reporter-Times should install a "LOL" button.

Cheers!

Moose 65
Saturday, October 20, 2012: 10:16 pm
More from Moose 65

Don't worry they will finish it and blame the republicans for starting it and say democrats are good for finishing it good.

NOW lets move on, does this mean they will repair 37 like they did up North of 44 or will they wait until we yell hard and loud to fix the highway then start changing the road to I 69 highway? ALSO does this throw egg on the city for trying to force the annexations that may not happen for 20 years?

5 comments found